Monday, December 22, 2014

The 20 Best Things of 2014

I think most people would agree that 2014 was not a great year, but that doesn't mean it didn't have its highlights. Here are mine, bearing in mind, as always, that there are plenty of things from this year I'm sure I'd love that I just haven't gotten around to experiencing yet (Whiplash, Obvious Child, Alt-J, Bleachers, Getting On, etc., etc.). Also, with regards to TV I try not to list shows that I have listed in previous years. Gotta keep things fresh.

Without further ado...
(In random order)


1. “Get Lucky”/“Same Love” at The Grammys
This is why we need the Grammys. Ridiculous, over the top, calculated, and edging up against cheesy - all things that popular music should always be. In an age when it’s not cool to try too hard, thank goodness that the Grammys stay old school in their desire to let us see them sweat.

2. Dumb Starbucks
Regardless of how it turned out, for a moment it was a shooting comet of monoculture. A true happening. A genuine phenomenon in an era when that no longer seems possible. And it moved at the speed of the Internet. It appeared on a Thursday, by Saturday it was the epicenter of the world, and by Monday it no longer existed. The cultural life-cycle of the Internet Age in its purest most distilled form. And the fact that it happened a few blocks from my house didn’t hurt.

3. The Lego Movie
Why can’t all movies be like this? That's a serious question because it doesn’t seem like it should be that hard.

A comedy packed wall-to-wall with jokes. Jokes that respect the intelligence of the audience. Jokes that don’t seem like they had to pass through ten levels of corporate approval first. Jokes that don’t stop for the “story” or the “message” because the jokes are part of the story and the message.

I walked away thinking “how did they get away with making that” and also “how does everyone not?” Because The Lego Movie is awesome. And wouldn’t it be nice if everything was?

4. Spoon - They Want My Soul
Has there ever been a more appropriately named band than Spoon? You never really think about spoons but they're an essential utensil. Without a spoon you can't eat cereal, or soup, or ice cream. Spoons help us get sustenance and happiness, yet how often do stop to consider their importance? Almost never. Spoons are always just there. Yet you can get by without a fork and without a knife, but not without a spoon. 

In 13 years Spoon the band has never released a bad album. They've never topped the charts or headlined music festivals, but they have put out more consistently great music than any other band during that time. Metacritic ranked Spoon as the top overall artist of the decade for the 2000s, yet people rarely mention them when discussing great bands. Spoon is, at this point, largely taken for granted. It's not trendy to say that They Want My Soul is the best album of the year or that "Do You" is the year's best song, but it's also not NOT trendy. It just is. Two decades in and Spoon produces the finest work of their brilliant career, yet almost no one noticed or cared. 

I think it's time we started giving Spoon(s) their due.

5. Lupita Nyong’o
Lupita Nyong'o will not be a star. I sadly have no faith that Hollywood will know what to do with a dark-skinned black actress with an unconventional name who seems interested in playing challenging roles in movies for adults. But regardless of where Lupita goes from here we will always have this glorious awards season. The speeches. The dresses. The sense of possibility. The triumph of merit. Like the first flush of love always does, this will all fade. But it was a wonderful ride.

I happened to be in the lobby of the Dolby Theater the night of the Oscars, and when Lupita’s name was called the place went wild. Jaded executives who hadn’t looked up from their phones all night stared with rapt attention at the monitors as she gave her perfect speech. And theater employees stared at her with recognition, solidarity, and awe – “another old white men’s club has accepted someone who looks like me”. In the moment the world felt a little smaller, a little more inclusive, a little better place. And then as soon as it ended, as always, a commercial for Pepsi.   

The popularity of something this purposefully weird and off-putting makes me deliriously happy. In a deeply divided country that can't agree on basically anything, who knew that all it took to bring us together was a twelve-minute-long repetitive and absurdist theme song parody video featuring a serial killer slowly murdering everyone on screen. Too Many Cooks 2016!

7. Birdman
Ironic that movie ostensibly about a superhero would leave me yearning for a spinoff movie, but wow what I wouldn't give to watch a Before Sunset-like movie featuring Emma Stone and Edward Norton's characters. This movie though is about superheroes the way Lord of the Rings is about jewelry. Birdman isn't a movie I would recommend to, say, a plumber. But to anyone involved in a creative, artistic field or endeavor, Birdman is holy scripture. It's self-important, naval-gazing, elitist Hollywood masturbation and I can't remember the last movie that felt so relatable and true. As an artist you always wonder - are you flying or are you falling, or is it basically the same thing? At last there's a film that says (among other things), maybe you're living, maybe you're dying, whatever, at least you're a bird, man.

While we're somewhat on the topic of Emma Stone, I should mention that Emma Stone is a perfect human. Everything she does is perfect. And somehow this lip synch is even more perfect than her performance in Birdman. Which is really saying something. Remind me again why she’s not the biggest star in the world?

9. McConaughey’s True Detective monologues
These monologues are my spirit animal. Which probably doesn’t reflect well on me since Rust Cohle is a possibly sociopathic nihilist. But, you know, a fun sociopathic nihilist whom you root for. Which really, to state the obvious, is so many people on TV today. Nothing is going to seem stranger to future generations than the fact that the TV anti-hero was a thing that had to be invented and not just a thing that always was. And our storytelling is going to seem so artificial and primitive to them with its insistence on black and white, good and bad, and order where none really exists. That's why True Detective is such a landmark, because it’s also almost the platonic ideal of the television medium. It was all written by one person at one time. All directed by one person. Only the length that it needs to be. Knows exactly the story it wants to tell from beginning to end before the first frame is ever shot. And therefore has the ability to challenge its audience and take its time unveiling its secrets to them. Ten years ago a TV show couldn’t have spent a significant chunk of its running time every week to dark existential monologues. But TV has now evolved to where it’s always been destined to be. It’s fulfilling its potential at last. TV is no longer the new film; it’s now the new literature. Art is a flat circle. Speaking of which...

10. Serial
Radio is the new TV! (Apparently the band TV on the Radio was ahead of their times in more ways than one.) Because the hottest weekly show of 2014 was one you listened to in with your ears. Yes, thats right, 1948 called and it wants its form of popular entertainment back. Serial was just like Little Orphan Annie only if it had ultimately left unclear whether Annie was actually ever really an orphan or not. Also, imagine Annie was a real person.

True-life serialized podcasts are inevitably going to be coming out of the woodwork in 2015, but nothing will every be able to capture the zeitgeist like Serial has. 2014 will always be the year that we were riveted by listening to strangers spend ten minutes discussing the possible existence of a pay phone. And who knew that what we were all collectively yearning for was detailed descriptions of public parks? But that's the thing - reality is in the details. And after years of reality TV, Serial finally made actual reality a star.

11. The casts of HBO’s Sunday night comedy block (Veep/Silicon Valley)
A great TV show ensemble is like a truly great sports team. There are no weak links, everyone has a clear role and they execute it flawlessly, and it's almost impossible to pick a favorite player/character because they are all equally great in their own way. All of these things are more than true for Veep and Silicon Valley, and with Parks and Rec going off the air they are now in a dead heat for the best ensemble on TV. Watching the cast of Veep play off each other so effortlessly you often forget you're not watching real people. And the cast of Silicon Valley is like one of those albums where every song on it has at one point been your favorite. This hour block of comedy magic really proves the old adage that good directing is 90% good casting. And it's a true testament to the power of putting great people together and then getting the hell out of the way.

12. Last Week Tonight's net neutrality segment



Since sometime in 2004 I have missed maybe ten total episodes of The Daily Show, if that. In the years before it was available online, my bedtime, and often my social life, was dictated by what time The Daily Show came on. The "religious views" section on Facebook for years read simply "Jon Stewart". If I had to choose my one favorite "thing", the one most essential artistic creation in my life, it would without question be The Daily Show. So it's not to be taken lightly when I say that the instant this segment ended I knew I would never be able to watch The Daily Show the same way again. It was like watching first episode of The Sopranos the night it aired, or the hearing "Smells Like Teen Spirit" for the first time - I knew the game had changed in an instant and that nothing would ever be the same. Whenever The Daily Show eventually goes off the air, it will be easy to pinpoint this exact segment as the beginning of the end. Last Week Tonight is now unquestionably the most vital half hour on television, reaching heights nearly every week I didn't even know were possible. The Daily Show, even at its best now, feels almost like a relic of a different time. Enjoyable, but muted and inessential. Because theres no way that it could ever produce a segment like this.

Nothing will ever be able to erase or take away from The Daily Show's monumental contribution to our culture and the role that it has played in altering political discourse, but it's best days are now officially behind us. Brought down by a former member of the team. The pupil has become the teacher. The apprentice the master. The king is dead; long live the king.

13. Richard Sherman’s NFC Championship game interview



This made headlines and trended on twitter for days afterwards but really the story at its essence was just "entertaining athlete does something entertaining". So the strong reaction to this interview was far more damning to our sports culture today than it was to Richard Sherman. Muhmmad Ali used to do this kind of thing on a weekly basis and he's an icon because of it. But as our culture has gotten coarser it's also gotten safer and more sanitized. This interview was an antidote to all that, a throwback in the best way possible. By the end of the year NBA players were wearing "I Can't Breath" T-shirts at games and speaking their minds on social issues. Is that a direct result of Richard Sherman becoming a star by not giving a damn about decorum or his media training? No. But they're also not NOT connected.

14. The World Cup
Patriotism is dumb and insidiously harmful. Sports are ultimately meaningless diversions. Soccer is far from my or America's favorite game. Yet for one month every four years my entire life revolves around watching the World Cup. It's fascinating to watch how a country's soccer team reflects the country itself (Germany is efficient, Switzerland plays very defensively, America tries REALLY hard, etc.) and how that creates strong built-in rooting interests, even for people that know nothing about the sport. Also it's great to have a reason to drink in bars with big groups of people at odd hours of the day. And most of all it's incredibly compelling to know that possibly billions of people all over the world are watching the exact same thing at the exact same moment. This is why sports exist. Because for better or worsen there's nothing that can connect the globe and remind us how interconnected and similar we all are quite like watching grown men kicking a ball around. 2018 can't come soon enough.

15. The imagination on display in Snowpiercer
Snowpiercer isn’t a perfect movie by any means. It’s got plot holes galore. The special effects look like they were made using MS Paint. And tonally it’s a bit of a mess. But that’s just the point. It’s not trying to be perfect. It’s just trying to be itself. And it’s refreshingly allowed to follow its own muse. At a time when the rough edges get sanded off anything intended for mass consumption, Snowpiercer, despite the best efforts of Harvey Weinstein, is all rough edges. And that’s exactly what is so special about it.

Not to spoil anything, in the very likely chance you haven’t seen it yet, but there’s a moment in the film where just before a huge fight the bad guys cut open a fish and dip their axes in its blood. It’s a long, drawn-out set piece that ultimately means nothing. It’s never again referenced, repeated, or explained. And the very fact that it’s so seemingly unnecessary is what makes it so exciting. Because it’s exactly the kind of thing you don’t expect to see in a sci-fi action film starring Captain America and two Academy Award winners. In summer movies that sort of scene is always literally the first one to go. For instance I’m positive there’s no fish blood scene in the next Avengers movie. But there should be. Because whatever is going to happen in the next Avengers movie we will all have seen some variation of a million times. And we’ll watch it, and maybe we’ll enjoy it, and then we’ll go on about our lives. But with Snowpiercer there are so many weird, imaginative, idiosyncratic choices on display that it’s anything but disposable. Maybe the film is too strange or bloody or implausible or over the top for you. But there’s also a chance at least that it could be a movie that stays with you the rest of your life. So memo to Hollywood: Less super heroes please, more fish blood.

16. Boyhood
At a time when it seems like everything has, to some degree, already been done, it’s truly rare to see something totally original and unique that you know you will never see the likes of again. It’s rarer still when the execution of such an idea exceeds that idea itself. The hook of Boyhood – literally watching a boy age before our eyes - is what made it so powerful, but the way the material was handled is what made it transcendent. When you hear the concept of the movie you go in expecting a certain narrative – first day of school, trouble with friends, trouble with parents, first kiss, first love, first heartbreak, first drink, getting into college, etc. – because that’s what we’ve been conditioned to expect from coming-of-age stories. And those beats all happen to some degree, but never with the narrative momentum you’re expecting. They just kind of happen. And then the next thing does. And then the next. Because in real life, unlike in movies, there is no narrative. Life isn’t a story; it’s just a collection of things that happen. A series of moments. And nothing has ever captured that better than Boyhood. Boyhood is something totally new, something that is neither fiction nor documentary - Boyhood is life.

(And for me particularly that statement is especially true since like Eller I grew up in Houston. So Boyhood, was in many ways literally the story of my boyhood. Going to Astros games, rolling down the hill at the Miller Outdoor Pavilion, going camping with my Dad at Perdenalas State Park, going to Austin on my first unsupervised trip with a member of the opposite sex, and the list goes on - these are all very specific things that were also a part of my real life. So I think it’s safe to say that no work of art will ever be more personally relevant and resonant to me than Boyhood. Just a surreal thing for me to watch with strangers.)

17. Taylor Swift – "Style"
So look, "Shake It Off" is a perfect pop song, and "Out of The Woods" is great, and "All You Had to Do Was Stay" is a perfect driving song that makes me glad to be alive, and "Blank Space" is very well produced, and "This Is How You Get the Girl" and "I Wish You Would" are super underrated, and “Clean" is kind of fascinating, and "Welcome to New York" is a song that exists, but for me all I really want to talk about and listen to and obsess over is “Style". I feel like “Style" is not only maybe my favorite pop song since "Teenage Dream" (or maybe even since "Since U Been Gone") but that it is the perfect Taylor Swift song. By that I mean that it’s about something very specific and personal, but yet somehow feels totally universal. That’s when something is great, right - when it’s about something that has never happened to you but still totally FEELS like it has? I mean it’s a song that is pretty explicitly about very specific things that happened between Taylor Swift and Harry Styles, yet somehow it feels like it’s about my life. It feels like growing up or being young or something like that, yet the content and tone of “Style" are not remotely what my actual life was like growing up. But it evokes some primal archetype of being young and hormonal and wild and careless that is so hardwired in each us from movies and TV and AMERICA that I feel like I can deeply relate to “Style" even though I pretty clearly can’t. And it does that by being so personal that it somehow comes out the other side as universal. Which is the magic trick that has made Taylor Swift the biggest pop star in the world. A trick that is never going to go out of style. (Sorry, I had to.)

18. The Roosevelts
"Ken Burns' Documentaries About The Roosevelts" should be a YouPorn category. I just can't imagine anything that would excite me any more than that. Seeing such human greatness brought to vivid life was exhilarating. Washington and Lincoln get all the love but I've always maintained that the Roosevelts were both equally as great, so it was great to see them get their due. This series could have been twice as long and it still wouldn't have been half as long as I wanted it to be. #TeamRoosevelt4Lyfe

19. Louie – "In the Woods"
I know I've written about Louie here before but theres just too much to talk about from the show this season – the "fat lady" speech, a six-episode arc about a hurricane and falling in love with a lady that can't speak English, Charles Grodin, etc. - for me to leave it off my list. It was the most singular season of an already seminally singular show. But for me the ultimate embodiment of the Louie ethos, and finest hour (ok, hour and ten minutes) of television this season, was this short film masquerading as a two-part television episode. It was a straight up drama on a "comedy" show. It barely featured any of the main series cast. It was the most touching, tender, and shatteringly heartbreaking thing on TV this year, yet it came from a series that started its season with episodes about a guy hurting his back shopping for a vibrator and accidentally punching a woman in the face during sex.

If Louie CK had added an extra twenty minutes on and released this in theaters it would have been one of the best feature films of the year. But he didn't need to because all he cared about was making exactly what he wanted in exactly the way he wanted to make it. Medium be damned. And in the process he proved once and for all that the only rule on TV these days is that there are no rules at all. We live in exciting times.

20. Bojack Horseman
Speaking of exciting times, Bojack Horseman could not have existed any time before this year. Binge watching and Netflix, the acceptance of cartoons that are made specifically for educated adults, and the dissolution of the notion of genre all had to happen before Bojack Horseman could possibly exist. There are a thousand different precedents for the elements of the show, but absolutely no precedent for the show in totality. It's an entirely original creation - something there are simultaneously less and more of every passing day.

Perhaps my favorite perspective on art is best expressed by a line in the musical title of show: "I'd rather be nine people's favorite thing than a hundred people's ninth favorite thing". Bojack Horseman definitely has no interest in being anyone's ninth favorite thing. It's an animated show about a anthropomorphic horse that is actually a deep exploration of the nature of depression. It is packed with silly visual gags about animals and absurdist pop culture jokes, yet it ultimately builds to a heartbreaking monologue about the nature of human goodness. It's the singular vision of a singular creator and as such it's certainly not for everyone. But as a longtime fan of Raphael Bob-Waksberg I had a strong feeling I personally would love it. Yet it exceeded even my highest expectations. So if you haven't seen it yet, as many people haven't, please watch Bojack Horseman. It just might be your new favorite thing. It sure was mine.


Friday, February 28, 2014

Oscar Preview 2014: What Can Keep Gravity Down?


Need far too many words about and picks for every category at this year's Oscars? Need to know if Gravity is indeed an undeniable force? (sorry, had to.) Then read on...

Visual Effects
So I’ll kick this thing off with my little spiel on Gravity:

Gravity is a great film. Original, suspenseful, breathtaking, and masterfully made, but will all the hype and accolades given to it this year seem utterly ridiculous 50 years from now? I think they will. Because if there was ever a movie that’s not going to age well it’s a movie that’s almost entirely a special effects showpiece. Now I know there was a great suspenseful narrative and a wonderful performance by Sandra Bullock at the heart of the film, but ultimately none of that matters if the movie doesn’t create a stunningly realistic you-are-really-there vision of outer space. And with technology becoming outdated at record speeds I seriously doubt that even 20 years from now the outer space of Gravity will look anything other than cheesy and fake. This is why making “NEW” the main selling point of anything is both a blessing and a curse. But I guess with Gravity we’ll cross that bridge when we get there. For now the Academy can already start engraving this statue.

Will Win: Gravity
Should Win: Gravity

Sound Mixing
Sound Editing
Are they two technical awards that seem basically interchangeable and that 98% of the voters have no real way to objectively quantify or judge? Then give them to Gravity!

Will Win: Gravity!
Should Win: Gravity?

Live Action Short
I haven’t seen any of these but by all accounts Just Before Losing Everything is supposed to be the best of the bunch. But its also the longest and subtitled. Everyone seems to be picking The Voorman Problem instead because its in English and stars Martin Freeman, the only recognizable name/face in the category. I’m gonna go the other way and predict that the people willing to vote for this category are too old to care who Martin Freeman is and have penty of time to sit through and soak in the only 30-minute-long Just Before Losing Everything.

Will Win: Just Before Losing Everything
Should Win: Who knows

Animated Short
I actually have a strong and educated opinion on this! I didn’t see all of the nominees like I often do, but I did see Get a Horse! and there's no way it’s losing. It’s a tribute to old Hollywood (check) and the magic and craft of movie making (check) but it uses new technology and new techniques to feel inventive and original (check). It’s the first animated Disney film to ever be directed by a woman (check), it’s produced by modern animation god John Lasseter (check), has the power of the Disney machine behind it (check), and features a voice performance by freaking Walt Disney himself (all of the checks). This is a lock.

Will Win: Get a Horse!
Should Win: Get a Horse!

Documentary Short
The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life is about a 109-year-old piano-playing Holocaust survivor (who died during the final week of Oscar voting!). So thanks for coming all other nominees, but you’re no longer needed because The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life is about a 109-YEAR-OLD PIANO-PLAYING HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR (WHO DIED DURING THE FINAL WEEK OF OSCAR VOTING)

Will Win: THE 109-YEAR-OLD PIANO-PLAYING HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR
Should Win: THE 109-YEAR-OLD PIANO-PLAYING HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR

Production Design
They should just rename this award the Baz Luhrmann Award. (By which I really mean the Catherine Martin Award. But whatever.)

In related news, congrats to Wes Anderson for winning next year’s Baz Luhrmann/Catherine Martin Award for his work on The Grand Budapest Hotel!

Will Win: The Great Gatsby
Should Win: The Great Gatsby

Costume Design
When in doubt with this category ask yourself, did any of the nominees this year inspire their own collection at Brooks Brothers or Tiffanys? If still in doubt, ask yourself, did any of the nominees involve lavish period party scenes with thousands of costumed extras? And if still in doubt, ask yourself did any of the nominees contain a memorable scene where Leonardo DiCaprio literally threw costumes directly into the camera? If the answer to all of these is yes then you have your winner.

Will Win: The Great Gatsby
Should Win: The Great Gatsby

Original Song
It seems weird that the Year of Pharrell isn’t going to capped by an Oscar win for Pharrell, but unfortunately it seems that nothing is going to stand in the way of Robert Lopez EGOTing for “Let It Go”. Now considering Robert Lopez’s Emmy is only a Daytime Emmy I don’t think it should count as a true EGOT. And also, since this category doesn’t contain Lana Del Rey’s “Young and Beautiful” its results shouldn’t count anyway. But whatever. I expected a bit more from the composer of Avenue Q and Book of Mormon than “Let It Go”, but it’s gonna be a Broadway staple from now until the sun explodes so I guess it winning here is fine. But seriously, go listen to “Young and Beautiful” again. It will make you feel all of the feelings. The ones that “Let It Go” is only playing at.

Will Win: “Let It Go”
Should Win: “Happy” (but also “Young and Beautiful”)

Original Score
Considering how little dialogue there actually was in Gravity it relied on its score far more than any of the other nominated movies. And since none of these scores were particularly memorable on their own, voters will just think back to which one they remembered being most impactful on its film. And Gravity’s certainly was the most obvious in that regard. But it also felt like it could have been made by pretty much anyone and plugged into pretty much any epic high-class adventure movie. 

Win Butler’s score for Her though could have only been made by members of Arcade Fire and only been used for Her. It helped vividly create the world in which Her takes place, filling in what the production design and costumes couldn’t. It created a mood, yet felt unobtrusive while doing it. That sort of work doesn’t generally win awards, but it should. Plus how cool would it be to add Arcade Fire (or basically Arcade Fire) to the list of unexpected music branch Oscar winners alongside Eminem, Three 6 Mafia and Trent Reznor? To answer my own question, it would be awesome.

Will Win: Gravity
Should Win: Her

Makeup
Please let it be Jackass. Please let it be Jackass. Please let an actual human being say the sentence “And the Oscar goes to Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa”. Oh please sweet lord in heaven let it be Jackass.

(Spoiler alert: It won’t be Jackass)

Will Win: Dallas Buyers Club
Should Win: Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa

Film Editing
Uhhhhhh…..

I have no idea.

And when in doubt this year go with Gravity.

Will Win: Gravity
Should Win: Gravity I guess

Cinematography
Lubezki!

Finally, a chance to make up for one of the all time Oscar travesties: Emmanuel Lubezki not winning for Children of Men. Or for Tree of Life. Or for anything he’s ever done. But there’s a zero percent chance that doesn’t get remedied this year.

You’re up next Roger Deakins

(Fun fact: Did you know that Emmanuel Lubezki also shot Reality Bites???)
(Fun fact II: Did you know that I have friends?)

Will Win: Gravity
Should Win: Gravity

Documentary Feature
This is a tough one. I haven’t actually seen any of these, but feel like I know enough about them to make a pretty informed guess.

This category has really changed since the old days when the winner used to always be the most depressing talking head documentary they could find. In recent years populist and relatively uplifting films like Searching for Sugarman, Undefeated, Man on Wire and March of the Penguins have all won. Which would seem to point to 20 Feet From Stardom winning this year. But it seems like Act of Killing has been seen by just as many, if not more people, it’s supposed to be undeniably powerful, and despite the changing nature of the category I still say genocide tops underappreciated backup singers. But I could easily be wrong.

Will Win: Act of Killing
Should Win: Act of Killing

Animated Film
I haven’t seen any of these because I’m strictly ride or die Team Pixar but Frozen is made by Disney (which is Pixar-adjacent), is pulling in Titanic money and good reviews, and has what seems like particularly weak competition. So congrats to Frozen for coming out the year before The Lego Movie is eligible to win all of the awards ever.

Will Win: Frozen
Should Win: Frozen

Foreign Language Film
I find it hard to believe that these were truly the five best foreign language films released last year as none of these had anything even remotely approaching a wide release. But then there’s a long and storied history of this category making no sense so this year is really just par for the course.

While most Oscar prognosticators are saying that The Hunt is coming on strong I’m going to stick with the only nominee that I remember playing at multiple theaters around Los Angeles in the past few months: The Great Beauty.

Will Win: The Great Beauty
Should Win: wish I knew

Adapted Screenplay
It's absurd that Before Midnight is up for adapted screenplay. The reason given for the classification is that it's based on existing characters, but by that logic every screenplay to a sequel should be an adapted screenplay. Which would be idiotic. But whatever.

Before Midnight is in the running for my all-time favorite film and that's largely on the strength of its screenplay. The magic of the Before movies is that watching them is like being able to eavesdrop on the greatest conversations of all time. The dialogue is what we wish we could all sound like when we talk. But it has an ease and naturalness to it that barely makes it seem like dialogue at all. It's the platonic ideal of a screenplay. But it has no shot here. Because 12 Years a Slave feels too important not to give it to. Which I'm fine with. It's a worthy winner. But in another world, in another life, Before Midnight winning sure would be nice.

Will Win: 12 Years a Slave
Should Win: Before Midnight

Original Screenplay
Woody Allen is Woody Allen and if there’s ever a year Woody Allen isn’t winning an Oscar it’s this one. Dallas Buyers Club is already likely winning three other awards so voters will feel like it’s been honored enough. So that leaves three Best Picture nominees who likely aren’t going to win anything else. So which one does the Academy want to throw a bone to? Well you can never count Alexander Payne out of a screenplay race, only Nebraska wasn’t written by Alexander Payne, it was written by Bob Nelson, and no one knows who Bob Nelson is (and having the worlds most generic name probably isn’t helping with that). So that leaves David O. Russell for American Hustle (can some rapper please use the line “I’m an American hustle like David O. Russell”?) or Spike Jonze for Her.

American Hustle at one point seemed like the Best Picture front-runner but has since faded in a huge way. Still, with all those nominations it seems crazy that it will leave empty-handed. But is screenplay really the place to honor it? Most of the complaints about the movie (including mine) are that it seemed like a bunch of great performances in search of a story. Seriously, I doubt even David O. Russell himself could neatly and accurately summarize the plot of the movie. He’s even basically admitted that he really only cared about character, not story, which can be fine, but in this case it let to a movie that felt like an unorganized mess. It was series of engaging scenes and then it was over, having said nothing and making no emotional impact. 

Her on the other hand, was bursting with thoughts and ideas and feelings. It spoke to who we are, how we live, and where we might be headed. It was universal and deeply personal. It was one of the best films of the past 10 years largely because it was so masterfully constructed. And it felt thrilling original. Which is after all one of the key words in the title of this category. So while it seems improbable that the out-of-touch old men who make up the bulk of the Academy membership and probably don't even own cell phones would give an award to Her, I really think Spike Jonze takes this one. A boy can hope anyway.

Will Win: Her
Should Win: Her

Supporting Actress
This is clearly a two woman race and if Jennifer Lawrence hadn’t just won last year she would take it easily. But she DID just win last year. And since this award could easily, most years, be re-titled “Hottest Newcomer” instead of “Best Supporting Actress” a previous win would seem to disqualify her. But she’s so good in American Hustle and she’s America’s reigning sweetheart (and our future supreme ruler) that you can’t count her out. Lupita Nyong’o though seems to have all the momentum now. She’s the hip choice, has run a great campaign, given great speeches, won most of the precursor awards, and oh yeah, gave the better performance. Oscars have been won for far less than her soap scene alone in 12 Years a Slave, and she had many more scenes of equal difficulty and power. So while the margin is going to be razor thin, Lupita is going to take this round. But don’t cry for Jennifer Lawrence; all she has left is everything else in the world.

Will Win: Lupita Nyong’o
Should Win: Lupita Nyong’o

Supporting Actor
If you want to see how far we haven’t come in this country in our attitudes towards the gay community look no further than the response to Jared Leto’s performance in Dallas Buyers Club. The word thrown around most often about it is “brave”? But why is it “brave”? Because he’s playing a transgender person? Explain to me what’s “brave” about that. Because I didn’t realize that portraying someone different than yourself was considered “brave”; I thought it was just called doing your job as an actor. I mean isn’t that literally the dictionary definition of acting? Now this is certainly a very reductive way to view these roles, but if we’re going to base our awards voting on which performance is the most “brave” isn’t taking pleasure out of whipping black women while yelling the N-word at them much more emotionally difficult and uncomfortable in 2013 than putting on a dress and pretending to be attracted to men? Based on the overwhelming support for Jared Leto it would appear not. His performance is humane and touching, but it’s nowhere near the level of Michael Fassbender’s work. It seems for most voters though, that it’s not about the work itself. It’s about rewarding Jared Leto for his “courage” in taking on the part. As a voter told Entertainment Weekly about why he was voting for Jared Leto, “it’s a very risky performance that you could easily be ostracized for.” So you could be ostracized for playing a transgender person but not for playing a sociopathic racist? That says so much about Hollywood and America and the Academy. And it makes me sad that we’re not further along as a culture, and that Michael Fassbender is going to get reverse-Brokebacked, but mostly that “Academy Award Winner Jared Leto” is now a thing that is going to be true.

Will Win: Jared Leto
Should Win: Michael Fassbender

Actress
Cate Blanchett is winning this more than anyone has ever won anything. Which is really saying something since this is a very good group of nominees. When Meryl Streep is the weakest of the bunch you know you’ve got a solid category. But Cate Blanchett is blowing them all off the map so it hardly seems worth discussing. So instead let’s talk about Amy Adams.

Were you aware that Amy Adams is slowly becoming one of the most critically acclaimed actresses of all time? It’s true. Here’s the compete list of actresses with more Oscar nominations than Amy Adams by the time they turned 40: Kate Winslet, Deborah Kerr, Norma Shearer, Bette Davis, and Meryl Streep. That’s it. Maybe not strictly a murderers row, but still, surprised Amy Adams is in such elite company aren’t you? But you shouldn’t be because Amy Adams has become a shockingly reliable signifier of quality. She’s quietly become the queen of the indie prestige project. Need proof? Leaving out Man of Steel here are the directors of her last four films: David O. Russell, Spike Jonze, Clint Eastwood, and Paul Thomas Anderson. Now that IS a murderers row. Is Amy Adams, the princess from Enchanted (a role for which I still maintain she should have been Oscar nominated), really the new Kate Winslet? Or even the new Meryl Streep? It’s not as crazy as it sounds. And American Hustle is her finest work yet. She’s an absolute revelation in it. And in any other year she takes home the statue. No one is beating Cate Blanchett this year, but don’t worry, if we’ve learned anything about Amy Adams, it’s that she’ll be back.

Will Win: Cate Blanchett
Should Win: Cate Blanchett

Actor
Matthew McConaughey is this year’s Ben Affleck. He's going to win for turning his career around as much as for the work itself. And in that sense True Detective is the anti-Norbit. Seeing constant ads for the show are a great reminder of just how complete his career transformation has been. And speaking of transformations, the only thing Oscar voters love more than redemption narratives are physical transformations for roles. So although it seems weird that in one of the best years ever for actors the Oscar is going to go to Matthew McConaughey, that’s almost certainly what’s about to happen. And that’s a shame. Because while it’s a great performance and a worthy winner, there are two performances I like even better.

Chiwetel Ejiofor is the heart and soul of 12 Years a Slave (and has one of the only names harder to spell than McConaughey). Giving a great performance as the lead of the Best Picture frontrunner is usually enough to win an Oscar. But despite all his suffering and gnashing of teeth, the bulk of his performance is actually, due to the nature of the part, very internal. For me the nuance and subtext of the performance are what make so great, but that non-bombastic nature in addition to Chiwetel being a virtual unknown prior to this year is probably going to keep him from winning a brutally tough category.

On the opposite end of the bombastic spectrum is my pick, if I had one, Leonardo DiCaprio. For years I’ve found Leo to be somewhat stiff and unbelievable, so it makes sense that his two best performances would be Django Unchained and The Wolf of Wall Street, two movies where he didn’t concern himself with naturalism or seriousness. By embracing his inner comedic character actor he paradoxically finally comes off as comfortable in his own skin. It’s like he finally realized that he’s always been miscast as himself. He works much better when he’s someone else. And there was no more extreme someone else to be in film last year than Jordan Belfort. And Leo wrings every bit out of the part that he can. The speeches, the boat confrontation with Kyle Chandler, the final fight with Margot Robbie – it’s just three straight hours of Oscar-worthy scenes. The Quaaludes scene alone should have won him an Oscar and was the best ten minutes of any movie released in 2013. It should be shown to aspiring physical comedians everywhere. Leonardo DiCaprio is the new Jim Carrey; who knew? Ultimately though Leo is getting shafted here because the character was so unlikable and because large numbers of voters had issues with the film. But Leo will never be better, Jordan Belfort is going to go down as his most iconic non-Titanic role, and 10 years from now it’s going to look criminal and inexplicable that he didn’t win the Oscar for it. There continues to be no justice with regards to Jordan Belfort, only this time in an entirely different way.

Will Win: Matthew McConaughey
Should Win: Leonardo DiCaprio

Director
I think 12 Years a Slave is by far the best picture. And Steve McQueen is huge reason why. I don’t think another person alive could have taken the same material as made it as powerful and memorable. But considering Ang Lee won this award last year for Life of Pi it’s clear that this award often means MOST direction. And I’m fine with that. If you spend years of your life trying to realize a singular and seemingly impossible vision and finally pull it off brilliantly while pushing the entire art form forward in the process you deserve an Oscar for your efforts. So this is a really close call for me. But I thought James Cameron should have won for Avatar, and for the same reasons I think Alfonso Cuaron should take it this year. Which is what he’s going to do whether I want him to or not.

Will Win: Alfonso Cuaron
Should Win: Alfonso Cuaron

Picture
This is at this point a two picture race. So let's just focus on those two:

Gravity is a thoroughly original and entertaining movie. It’s a technical marvel and visually unlike anything that has come before.

12 Years a Slave is the new Schindlers List. It’s going to be taught in schools. Seeing it changed how I view the world.

As I’ve said countless times over the years, The Oscars matter because they are a historical document. A record of what mattered. An imperfect, flawed, often egregiously wrong record, but the one record that we know will still be around and still be referenced in 100 years. In 200 years. In 1,000 years. And what do we want on that record as the best film of 2013? Something that will soon look like a primitively shot space epic with a rail thin plot, or the most well-crafted and accurate look yet at one of humanity’s most important and painful chapters?

In Entertainment Weekly’s Oscar preview they stated “In short, 12 Years is heartbreaking; Gravity is groundbreaking”. I agree. And only one of those qualities is one that lasts.

Will Win: 12 Years A Slave
Should Win: 12 Years A Slave

Monday, January 27, 2014

Daft and Punk'd: The Grammys 2014

The Grammys are insane and might very well be nothing more than one very long, cruel practical joke so here, read my breakdown of every single performance and the four major awards at the Grammys! Enjoy!

Beyonce and Jay-Z
“To kick off the Grammys…here’s a person not nominated for any individual Grammys tonight! So give a warm Grammy welcome to Beyonce and a disoriented old man!”

Nothing makes me happier than the fact that in Obama’s America the person who sang the National Anthem at the Presidential Inauguration is the same person who got bleeped at the Grammys while having sex with a chair. I may generally have mixed feelings about Beyonce, but I’m becoming more and more pro-Beyonce by the minute.

Lorde
#2014

Think piece idea: the embrace of minimalism in music by children of The Great Recession

Think piece idea II: the children are our future – not such a bad thing?

While Lorde may want to be called Queen Bee, I prefer to call her Fiona Apple. Also, is epilepsy a thing now? It’s so hard to keep up with what the kids are into these days.

Hunter Hayes
True story: Mark David Chapman only shot John Lennon so he wouldn’t have to live to see his quotes projected during a Hunter Hayes performance at the Grammys. It’s just a shame there was no one present in the building who cared about protecting John Lennon’s legacy. (Yoko Ono burn!)

Anyway, the fastest possible way to get me to leave the room to use the bathroom is to utter the sentence “Next up a powerful new ballad by Hunter Hayes”, but from what I caught of it I’m just glad someone finally had the courage and originality to write a song promoting the idea that the listener is special and has the power to overcome adversity. About time we had a song like that.

Katy Perry
I want to take Lady Gaga and rub her nose in Katy Perry’s performance while yelling “bad dog” until she feels bad about what she’s done.

I’m generally powerless to resist a good Katy Perry song, but it says everything about Katy Perry that the part of her performance she appeared to put the least amount of thought and energy into was the singing. And it was maybe a little too on the nose to set that performance in the pits of hell. But whatever, Juicy J was on the Grammys. I just hope when Katy Perry grows up she can be more like Lorde.

Chicago /Robin Thicke
Quiz: without cheating name a member of Chicago

While we’re doing quizzes, here’s a good ol’ SAT-style analogy
Grammys : VMAs :: Robin Thicke and Chicago : Robin Thicke and Miley Cyrus

I don’t really know what my point is necessarily other than to say that anyone who thought the Miley Cyrus performance was the end of civilization as we know it should really watch that Chicago performance and then tell me which civilization seems more fun to live in. And I say this as someone who owns three Chicago albums.

Keith Urban/Gary Clark Jr.
Remember when pre-mainstream-fame Mumford and Sons got to perform with Bob Dylan at the Grammys? Gary Clark Jr. performing on the Grammys with Keith Urban is the exact opposite of that. By which I mean I’m really looking forward to bouncing my grandkids on my knee one day and telling them about the time I wasted five minutes of my life watching Gary Clark Jr. suffer through a Keith Urban song.

John Legend
Has anyone ever seen John Legend NOT at the Grammys? Pretty sure he lives at the Staples Center. And while the last 20 years may have seen the invention of the Internet and the iPhone, if John Legend is our Stevie Wonder then we have failed miserably as a people.

Taylor Swift
Not sure if Taylor Swift was performing at the Grammys or filming a shampoo commercial, but either way I thought it was pretty good. That being said, we take you seriously now Taylor. You can let the mean comments about that time you sang with Stevie Nicks go now. It would be cool next year for stage-Taylor Swift to be more like audience-Taylor Swift

Pink featuring Nate Ruess
Remember that time we tuned into a Cirque du Soleil show and a Pink concert broke out? By which I mean every awards show ever.

Fun fact: there was a shark in that audience that Pink just flew over
(Speaking of jumping the shark: Nate Ruess’ mustache)

Seriously though, I think Pink is a great performer and everything a pop star should be, I just wish she would get some new tricks already.

Ringo Starr
Good thing the Beatles’ legacy is literally impossible to soil because all I could think during that performance was "don’t let Ringo outlive Paul, don’t let Ringo outlive Paul…"

But really, please don’t let Ringo outlive Paul.

(Also, after that performance I feel certain that Pete Best is on even higher suicide watch than usual)

Kendrick Lamar/Imagine Dragons
I’m pretty sure Kendrick Lamar has never listened to an Imagine Dragons song, and I’m pretty sure their joint performance was a bit of a train wreck, but I’m also pretty sure I kind of loved it. And when during Kendrick’s last verse it appeared smoke was coming out of his microphone, well, that was totally apt.

For better or worse it’s performances like that that you can only get at the Grammys. They’re the whole reason we (and by “we” I mean I) tune in.

Kacey Musgraves
What if instead of having the Grammys we just had a Kacey Musgraves concert? Would anyone be opposed?

Two more Kacey Musgraves points:

1. I like Taylor Swift, but when Kacey Musgraves won Best Country Album I shouted SUCK IT TAYLOR SWIFT!!! Now Kacey has beaten Taylor and the circle of life begins anew.

2. Ten years from now nothing about these Grammys is going to seem dumber than the fact that Kacey Musgraves didn’t win Best New Artist.

(Are my Texas roots showing yet?)

Paul McCartney
I am an ardent and unabashed fan of Paul McCartney’s solo work but I think it’s telling that the only person they could get a shot of singing and dancing along enthusiastically to Paul’s song was his wife.

(Yoko Ono doesn’t count because it’s unclear if she was singing and dancing along or if she was just being Yoko Ono (Yoko Ono burn!))

Willie Nelson, Kris Kristofferson, Merle Haggard and Blake Shelton
Don’t know if it says more abot the Grammys or about hipsterdom that the hippest performance at the Grammys was Willie Nelson, Kris Kristofferson, and Merle Haggard. But gold star to whoever decided to cut almost exclusively to shots of rappers during it. Says a lot that Jamie Foxx seemed more into Merle Haggard than Taylor Swift and Taylor Swifts Dancing Friend did.

Daft Punk featuring everyone who is awesome
Okay, that made the whole night worth it. It was just as great as anyone could have predicted that it would be. Apparently when you get truly great people together to perform a truly great song great things happen. Who knew?

Sara Bareillis/Carol King
Did this happen? Was this a thing that happened? I have no idea if this actually happened or not. I might have dozed off.

Bruno Mars
While I was asleep I must have missed Bruno Mars’ performance. I mean this was the Grammys after all. You can’t have a Grammys without the Grammy mascot. There’s no way they would allow that. Right??? I’m sure he must have performed, so it’s a shame I missed my annual five minutes of being a huge Bruno Mars fan. Oh well. Back to complete and total indifference towards all things Bruno Mars. Til next year Bruno Mars…

Metallica/Lang Lang
The Grammys are Willie Nelson performing with Blake Shelton and the Grammys are also Metallica performing with classical pianist Lang Lang. The Grammys are all things. The Grammys contain multitudes. So once the shock of seeing Metallica on CBS wore off I realized that the performance was actually thoroughly Grammys, no matter how atypical the Metallica part of it appeared. In the end I’m not sure how I felt about it as a performance, but I’m glad it happened and that I saw it. Long live the Grammys!

“Same Love”
I’ll try and keep this brief…

As someone who considers Eminem performing on the Grammys with Elton John a seminal moment of his adolescence I had been looking forward to the performance of “Same Love” on the Grammys for months now because I recognized it’s potential to be a similar moment for a new generation. And in the end it exceeded even my highest expectations.

I don’t know that it’ll be a cultural moment of the magnitude that Eminem’s performance was, but I think that’s more due to the fractured nature of our culture than the performance itself. Because in the end, it was a performance that perfectly captured the power of music, and its possibilities as an agent of love and hope and change. Now I know snark and the Grammys go hand and hand (I mean, have you read everything up until now?) but if you have negative snarky things to say about this performance please stop reading my blog forever and go take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror. And anyone who thinks the Grammys are a pointless waste of time needs to watch this performance and then shut the hell up forever.

Neil Portnow
NEIL PORTNOW!!! I LOVE THAT NEIL PORTNOW THINKS WE REMEMBER EXACT DETAILS OF HIS SPEECH FROM LAST YEAR. BECAUSE WE TOTALLY DO!!!! HOW COULD WE EVER FORGET YOUR SPEECHES NEIL PORTNOW?? YOU ARE THE HIGHLIGHT OF OUR LIFE! THAT’S WHY IT’S GREAT YOU POSITIONED YOURSELF RIGHT AFTER THE EMOTIONAL HIGH POINT OF THE EVENING. BECAUSE YOU ARE THE EMOTIONAL HIGH POINT OF THE YEAR!!!! NEVER CHANGE NEIL PORTNOW

Everly Brothers tribute
I wish I could go back in time to 1994 and try to explain to people how not weird it will seem when one day the lead singer of Green Day performs an Everly Brothers tribute at the Grammys. Who knew at the time what a pivotal song “Good Riddance (Time of Your Life)” would wind up being. Or maybe I just missed something and playing acoustic guitar with Miranda Lambert is the new punk.

Lindsey Buckingham, Nine Inch Nails, Dave Grohl, and Queens of the Stone Age
This was great but also seemed like it never really had a chance to get started. Right when it finally felt like it had some real momentum they cut to the credits. Which whenever you have a rocking performance that seems like it could really invigorate the whole evening it’s best to play the closing credits over it. Great job Grammys! Speaking of which….

THE  BIG FOUR AWARDS

(Okay so this first one wasn’t so great…)

Best New Artist
“Macklemore and Ryan Lewis meet the rap group Arrested Development. Arrested Development, meet Macklemore and Ryan Lewis.”

(Speaking of introductions, can a clip of Anna Kendrick wearing that dress while doing clever comedy bits play on a loop forever? Asking for a friend.)

---------

(But these next three awards…I mean you could make a legitimate case that these are the actual song, record, and album of the year. Not an embarassing choice among them, and in all three cases the best choice out of all of the nominees. Of course all this means is that next year all of the awards are going to go to Bruno Mars and Phil Collins.)

Song of the Year
The Grammys not giving Song of the Year to “Same Love”, the most Grammys song ever, is the most Grammy thing ever. If a white rapper collaborating with a female vocalist and live instrumentation for a positive song about human rights can’t win a Grammy then what can? An ever better song by a hip young outsider dabbling in a genre all her own, challenging the mainstream status quo?? It’s like I don’t even know you any more Grammys!

Record of the Year
Daft Punk remaining in character to receive their awards was the highlight of the night and will do way more for their sales, popularity, and notoriety with the public at large than reading a list of names could have done in a million years. Lady Gaga is so pissed that she’s not Daft Punk. And unlike Lady Gaga there’s a zero percent chance the popularity and success of this Daft Punk song will ever seem dumb.

Album of the Year
Well, we now live in a world where Daft Punk have won a Grammy for Album of the Year. We’ve come a long way since Vaughn Meader. I’d also just like to say that I called this one back in June. If I had bet money I would be a wealthy man. But also betting money on the Grammys is the ultimate form of insanity. So there’s that.

But with this win, here are the past four Album of the Year winners: Arcade Fire (The Suburbs), Adele (21), Mumford and Sons (Babel), and Daft Punk (Random Access Memories). No embarrassing clunkers in the lot and all albums that had real connection to the trends and popular music scenes of their day. Large numbers of people under the age of 40 own and enjoy each of those albums. And I know some people aren’t big on Mumford and Sons but each of those albums could make a legitimate claim as the best album of their respective years. I don’t know if it’s an extended fluke or a real trend. But it’s encouraging and I profoundly hope it continues. And on that note I’m now off to come to terms with Beyonce winning next year because it’s going to take me a whole year to be emotionally ready for it.