Showing posts with label David Letterman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Letterman. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2015

Goodbye to Everything


Between now and Wednesday the Internet will be overrun with think pieces, remembrances, appreciations, and retrospectives about David Letterman. It’s already been happening in fact. And at some point you’ll think “enough already!”. But the thing is this is the rare case when it can never be enough. Every last inch of space on the Internet could be filled with tributes to Dave and it still wouldn't feel sufficient. Because with the possible exceptions of Lucille Ball and Johnny Carson, David Letterman is the single most important and influential entertainer in the history of television. He single-handedly changed what was possible on TV and what the medium could be. He invented a totally new comedic sensibility. And on a personal level, he very well might have changed my life.

————————————

It’s not inaccurate to say that I was raised on The Late Show with David Letterman. I definitely grew up with it. It was the first “adult” TV I remember really being into. “The Late Shift”, about Dave and Jay’s battle for the Tonight Show job, was one of the first “adult” books I remember being obsessed with. One of the first things I remember doing on the Internet was figuring out how to go to The Late Show’s website. And throughout junior high and high school my bed time was dictated by Dave’s show. At first I could only stay up for the first half, unless there was a particularly good guest, in which case I could talk my parents into letting me stay for the first interview segment. Then as I got older I could regularly stay up for the second guest. And then finally I knew I was a grown up because I could always stay up for the musical guest. I rarely missed an episode; it was what my family did together every night. My Dad and my sister would come and go, but for my Mom and I, it was our thing. Even in my later high school years, when I was in the angsty I-hate-my-parents phase every kid goes through, I still looked forward to the opportunities I had to watch The Late Show with my mom. Then in college it was the thing that kept my connected to my past. Whenever I felt homesick I could stay up and watch Dave and it felt like home. And even though I haven't watched the show with any regularity in at least ten years now, it still feels like a part of me. Because it wasn't just a TV show to me, it was a ritual and a worldview.

——————————

Of all the bits Dave did over the years the one that will always stand out with me the most, the one my Mom and I still talk about regularly to this day, is Campaign 2000. Literally the only clip of Campaign 2000 I could find online is the one embedded above. So to give some context, Campaign 2000 started because Dave wanted to get Al Gore and George Bush to both make appearances on his show prior to the 2000 Presidential election. So every night he would have a segment devoted to updating his progress on making that goal happen. But, of course, it pretty quickly drifted off into something else entirely. As you'll see in the clip above by the summer of 2000 he had frequently stopped using the segment to discuss Bush and Gore at all. Often he would say it was time for Campaign 2000 and then launch into some absurdist comedy bit. But most nights he would set up Campaign 2000, the “sponsors” would be introduced, he would ask Paul and Maria Pope if they had any news, they never did, then the bit would end with Alan Kalter telling the audience who it had been “brought to you by”. I swear I remember a night when there were five different “sponsors" of the bit (including the nightly “Larry King, he looks like an owl!”) and then eight different other entities it had been “brought to you by”. And that was night when literally nothing happened in the bit itself. It was all set up, no punchline. Except for the fact that the set up WAS the punchline. And even after it continued well past the election and into mid-2001, it was all played more or less with a totally straight face. It was absurd and weird and amazing. And seeing things like Campaign 2000 on TV nearly every night helped make me who I am today.

See, as an artsy, thoughtful, introverted kid growing up in Houston, Texas, I never felt like I quite fit in.  I knew I wasn't into the same kinds of things my peers were into, but I didn't know what choice I had. Convention was all I knew. In the pre-Internet days I had no real sense of any wider world out there. I only knew the reality with which I was presented. But then I started watching The Late Show, and seeing someone do what’s basically performance art on a show on a major network that comes on right after the local news kind of blew my mind. It showed me that there was another way. That there are in fact no rules; that you can subvert convention. That art and comedy and television could be whatever you want them to be. That it was ok to be different and color outside the lines. But mostly it made me feel less different. “If this is on TV”, I thought, “then that must mean other people out there like it too. And if other people like it too then I must not be so weird after all.” It helped all us weirdos out there know that we weren’t alone. That we were all watching this strange gap-toothed man throw watermelons off a roof together. And that if this was possible, then anything was possible. And that thought was my salvation.

——————————-

Prior to Dave people had been doing bit and pieces of his style. Monty Python, Saturday Night Live, Andy Kauffman, Steve Martin, Samuel Beckett, Eddie Kovacs, and others, were all doing, or had done, some of what Dave would do. But he’s the one that put it all together. He didn't invent anti-comedy, or meta-comedy, or irony, or absurdism, but he was the first to put them all together on network TV five nights a week. And there was no real precedent for Dave’s unique vision. He was the first of his kind in way that few people ever have been. He basically created modern comedy, in a way that it’s impossible to overstate. A direct line can be drawn from David Letterman to every truly great piece of comedy from the past 30 years. This is a fact.

New York Magazine just published a great piece where former Late Show writers look back at ideas they tried to pitch to Dave over the years that were rejected. There are some great ones - reading out loud from The Encyclopedia of Carpet Samples, an in-studio zip line, a radio station for dogs, “All Week Long William F. Buckley Rates the Mustard”, and so on - but whats most striking is how modern they all sound. And yet nearly all the pitches in there are from over 20 years ago. In the article Dave says that the single most brilliant idea in the history of his show was to stage a battle between a humidifier and a dehumidifier. They ran both machines all show long and then at the end checked to see which had been better at its job. That was done in 1983 and it STILL seems ahead of its time 30 years later. I mean would any late night host actually attempt an idea like that today? I really don’t know that they would. I think comedy is still trying to fully catch up with what Dave created. We’re all still grappling with the possibilities.

——————————-

One of Dave’s classic bits from circa 2001 was something called “Is It Anything”. He would lift up a screen and flanked by Grinder Girl and Hula Hoop Lady (my names for them) would be a random person engaged in some random activity. Then the screen would go down and Dave and Paul would discuss whether they thought it was "anything" or not. There was never any criteria for what constituted “anything” or even what “anything” exactly meant. The whole bit was nebulous in meaning and intention. Was it meant to be a total joke or was it a legitimate competition? Was it supposed to be funny or just weird? Who were these people and what exactly were they doing there? Like Campaign 2000, it was silly and pointless and strange. And it was a perfect encapsulation of Dave’s entire ethos.

——————————————

After Dave goes off the air on May 20th the sun will still rise and set. Time will march on and his influence and importance will gradually be forgotten. And quite honestly his show hasn't been anything other than phoned in for years now. I tried to watch an episode about a year ago and it was almost painful. In the era of viral videos and silly games and lip synch battles Dave seems hopelessly old fashioned and out of touch. I’m sure kids today don’t quite get right now what all the fuss is about. Same thing happened to Carson once upon a time. And thats how life goes I guess. But for those of us who were there, we know attention must be paid. That few people have ever been more worthy of it. That no tribute can ever do him justice. Because David Letterman’s shows weren't just anything - they were everything.


So thank you Dave. For all of it. You’ll mean more to me to you’ll ever know.

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Things I Don't Understand

The expression “have your cake and eat it too”
Why would someone have a cake and not eat it? Has anyone ever ordered a cake so they could just look at it? Am I missing something here?

(And while we’re on the topic of strange expressions: Why do people say “kill two birds with one stone” like it’s a good thing? I mean why are we killing birds at all, let alone murdering them two at a time with rocks? That’s just cruel.)

Why there have been so many missed opportunities for synergy recently
-In the New York mayoral race I’m sure the candidates have things like “views on the issues” and “plans for the city”, but all I care about is the fact that none of them (to my knowledge) has made the song “Run This Town” a key element of their campaign. This is indefensible. Seriously at this point whoever is the first to use that song in a campaign ad or at a personal appearance has my vote. If no one uses it then I’m not voting. Simple as that. Now get to work, because through a strange loophole in the law my vote counts as 1,000 votes.

-Now that the book can be officially closed on the summer of ’09 it must be asked – how did we have a summer in which one of the most popular movies and one of the most popular songs were both about waking up hung over in Las Vegas and yet neither of them had anything to do with the other? Katy Perry’s CD came out like a year ago so that was plenty of time for the makers of The Hangover to incorporate “Waking Up In Vegas” into the movie in some way or at least add it to the soundtrack. It’s completely incomprehensible to me that this wasn’t done. I mean the song sounds like it was written for the movie. If they had commissioned Katy Perry to write a song specifically for the film there’s no way she could have done a better job. The fact that the music video isn’t one of those cheesy videos that features clips from the film amazes me. Whenever I hear the songs I can picture that video in my mind. How does it not exist? What kind of world is this? What, did Katy Perry and/or the makers of The Hangover have too much integrity? Did they not want to sell out? Someone explain this to me.

-The Noble Prize winners have been announced this week and none of the announcements have been accompanied by the playing of the song “Boom Boom Pow”? I mean wouldn’t any declaration of human greatness sound better if backed by that song? What expresses excellence in one’s field quite like a song with the lyrics “I’m on the supersonic boom/ Yall hear that spaceship zoom/ When when I step inside the room/ Them girls go apeshit, uh”? I mean the way he repeats the word “when” for no reason and then is unable to come with one more word at the end that rhymes with “room” – it’s genius. That is some good shit right there. Also, I may be confused as to the meaning of the word “good”.

The Parks and Recreation haters
Explain yourselves

Why I continue to watch Entourage
Our relationship is getting really abusive at this point. Next season I’m really expecting an episode entitled “Andy Stokan, Go Fuck Yourself”. And even then I think I would still keep watching. I haven’t been “involved” with something this bad since that time I dated Kirsten Dunst. I think next season I should just hit myself with a hammer once a week for 30 minutes until my brain starts hemorrhaging. It would be time better spent.

This


The David Letterman “Outrage”
Oh my God someone in the entertainment field was unfaithful to their significant other! A man in a position of power had a consensual sexual relationship with one of his subordinates! A clearly self-loathing and deeply insure person engaged in self-destructive behavior! Wow, I’m shocked. And, um, outraged or something? Seriously, how is any of this a big story? And how does the fact the he has made tons of jokes about infidelity over the years affect this in any way. That doesn’t make him a hypocrite, it makes him a comedian who was doing his job and will surely continue to do so. As Craig Ferguson said, "If we are now holding late-night talk show hosts to the same moral accountability as we hold politicians or clergymen, I'm out." And so am I. So back off and go back to being outraged about Jon and Kate or whatever. Because that shit is outrageous. Right? (I’m actually asking. Because I don’t know. They make my eyes bleed.)

Tuesday, October 05, 2004

So I Guess That Makes Jimmy Kimmel Ralph Nader...

(Well, many of you seem to have enjoyed last week’s “Marymount Musings” far too much, so as punishment, this week it’s back to more preachy rantings. Now I don’t want to hear about you enjoying yourself while reading ever again…)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you’ve been contemplating suicide, you should really put it off until at least 2009.

Because in 2009 not only will Barrack Obama will be sworn in as president, but, as was announced last week, Conan O’Brien will be sworn in as the new host of The Tonight Show. This will undo one of the most egregious sins in television history, the giving of The Tonight Show hosting job to a man the majority of the people didn’t want - Jay Leno. How and why this came about is detailed in one of the best books I’ve ever read, “The Late Shift” by Bill Carter, and it’s an amazingly engrossing page-turner you should pick up if you ever get a chance. But that’s neither here nor there. We can’t dwell on what could have or should have been. We have to deal with the here and now. And so until Conan assumes his rightful place in just over four years, we have to look at what we are stuck with. Examine the current administration if you will. And if you’ll examine it with me, you’ll realize that we can’t wait over four more years. We need change now.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Dave or Jay”?

It’s one of those questions that can tell you a lot about someone.

Like:
“Paul or John?”
“Lindsey Lohan or Hilary Duff?”
“Paper or plastic?”
Analyze This or Analyze That?”
“Bush or Kerry”

But really, what DOES it tell you?

Well let’s look at the two shows. They each have reoccurring comedy bits they do. One of the most popular on Dave’s show is “Will It Float?” In the “bit”, a screen is raised to reveal a tank of water and an object that will be dropped into that night. Dave and Paul discuss at length whether they think the item will float or sink. All the while, for no reason at all, a girl stands to one side of the tank twirling hula hoops and another girl wears what looks like an outfitter a stripper would wear in outer space and runs a grinder along a plate on her stomach while sparks fly everywhere. The presence of the two girls is never acknowledged or commented on in any way. The item is then dropped into the pool and either sinks or floats. Then the curtain lowers. And that’s it. That’s the comedy. There are many variations on this bit including “Hairpiece, Not a Hairpiece” “Millionaire, or A Guy Named Kenny” and, in the high point of the entire history of random comedy, “Potatoes, or Gavin McCloud”. One of the most popular of Jay’s “bits” is “Iron Jay” in which Jay makes jokes about current events while his face is reflected in a mirror that stretches out his features.

So to recap: comic brilliance vs. guy making funny faces in a mirror.

There are many more differences between the two shows too. One seems to love to have appearances by pro wrestlers, athletes and the hottest celebrities of the moment. The other prefers Regis Philbin, news anchors and Amy Sedaris. One show has a host who tries to be the focus of each interview by telling jokes at his guest’s expense. The other show has a host who tries to deflect so much attention from himself that he has done exactly one interview in the past eight years and talks about his life so little on air that even die hard fans don’t know that name of the mother of his newborn child. One show is openly despised by critics and anyone who cares passionately about quality entertainment and/or comedy. The other has won the Emmy in its category five of the past six years. I could go on for days but I think the point I’m trying to make can be crystallized with one simple comparison: the way in which “common people” are used on the shows.

On The Tonight Show, Jay’s most popular usage of regular non-celebrity folks is in a segment called “Jaywalking”. He goes out on the street and asks people seemingly simple questions and then waits while they either don’t know the answer or answer incorrectly. Then we all get to laugh at them. Because they are stupid. The most popular way Dave uses real people is in a segment called “Stupid Human Tricks” which, despite the name, feature people who carry on intelligent conversations with Dave before showing off random talents they have.

So to recap: One segment features the phrase “stupid human” in its title; the other features actual stupid humans. One show celebrates people’s dumbness; the other celebrates people’s talents. One show features comedy that panders to the lower common denominator. The other show does cutting edge comedy and trusts that its audience will be smart enough to appreciate it. One show aims for the heights of human creativity; the other peddles formulaic schlock.

And one show, Jay’s show, since 1996, the year of the Republican take over of Congress, has trounced the other in the ratings.

That means that the majority of American prefer Jay’s show to Dave’s show. Prefer an everyman simpleton host to a host who seems reserved and distant. Prefer well-worn old-fashioned comedy to progressive, hip humor. Prefer stupidity to intelligence.

And that is why the fact that The Tonight Show beats The Late Show in the ratings, for me, best encapsulates all that is wrong with America.

But we can make a difference. Each and every one of us. We have a choice. And now is the time to make that choice heard. What once seemed like an insurmountable lead in the ratings has dwindled by the day. Each day when new numbers come out they show the gap is closing to the point where it is almost a dead heat. For the first time in a long time it looks like Dave has a realistic shot to win this thing.

So vote. Vote with your remote. Vote for the side that creative, humanistic people side with. Vote for the side that celebrates the best humanity has to offer. Vote for intelligence.

Vote for Dave.

And then tell me how the election turns out.

If you need me Ill be watching the Daily Show.

Top 3 & 1/2 of the Week:
1.) The 90s
2.) Pavement - "Two States"
3.) Vitamin Water
3 & 1/2.) MLB Playoff anticipation